Gender Ads.Com: An incredibly thorough examination of gender issues in advertising/marketing

I frequently use this blog for acumulating info for current and future sections of Gender and Pop Culture (sort of like my own social bookmarking service).

Because my "real" social bookmark accounts (i.e. clipmarks.com and stumbleupon.com) resemble my blog, Defying Gravitas far more than the Women's & Gender Studies/Feminist content of the course for which I am trying to 'not forget' information I've found :o)...

Back to my original reason for posting...

I found GenderAds.com through XY.com (a site devoted to the study of men, masculinities, and gender from a feminist perspective) and because the paragraph that precedes the quoted material (see below, under link to GenderAds.com), specifically references the National Women's Studies Association (NWSA), I read through the site author's work and it's relevant to my course, quite comprehensive and well done (though hasn't been updated for over a year).

Gender Ads.Com:
"Why This Project addresses the reasons behind the formation of the site. How to Read Ads is an overview of some of the major approaches to the analysis of advertising, including semiotic analyses. Constructions of Gender is a representation of some of the major associations of gender and advertising, and is a good place to begin your study of the topics. Side by Side also offers an introductory approach to the subject, and I have collected side by side comparisons of men and women from major spreads in magazines. Controversy features some of the criticisms of the project that have been provided by viewers and students. Ambiguity addresses the idea that advertising, because of its ambiguous visual and literary messages, is difficult to interpret. Gender Landscape is a study that involves the public displays of billboard advertising, and it makes the point that gender ads are not limited to the “private” screens of print media. The Hall of Shame feature presents some of the most troubling images from the archive, but, in reality, any number of images could be placed on that page. How to Reference is a brief description of how you can reference or link to this site for research purposes."


1. BACKGROUND
What's New?
Why This Project?
How To Read Ads
Constructions
Side By Side
Controversy
Ambiguity
Gender Landscape
Hall of Shame
How to Reference
Comments
Links to This Site

2. FEMALES IN ADS
Roles
Strippers
Normalized Women
Exotics, General
Exotics, WOC
Exotics, Surreal
Feminine As Difficult
As Dolls
As Naggers
Body As Tool
Nymphomania
As Stupid
Consumers
As Nature
Bodies Only
Politics
As Violent
Faux Power
Female Masculinity

3. MALES IN ADS
Males, General
Male Sex
Violence Ag. Males
Males As Culture
Phallic
Male Fantasies
Normalized Males
As Stupid
Male Heroes
Men, In Control
Male Objects

4. TOGETHER IN ADS
Competition
Marriage
Violence
Death
Lesbians
Gay Men
Dual Objectified
Hetero Relations
Sex and Ads
Sexual Violence

5. OBJECTIFICATION
Body Parts I
Body Parts II
No Subject
Sex Object
Dehumanized
As Literal Object
No Product Connection

6. VISUAL MEANS
The Gaze
Wetness
Reductionism
Landscapes
Captured/Controlled
Linguistic Violence
Fear
Legs as Framing
Written On
Contorted

7. SPECIAL FEATURES
Billboards
A&F
Rejected Ads
Video Games
Men's Magazines
Man Show
TV Commercials
Progressive Ads
Mock Ads
UK Gender

8. OTHER TROPES
Kids and Ads
Ageism
Racism
Military Ads
Global Ads
Values Ads
Social Class Ads
Miscellaneous Ads

9. RESOURCES
Bibliography
Links
Taking Action
Educator Resources

Inserted from <http://www.genderads.com/>

Defying Gravitas- Jessie's stream of (sub)consciousness: Logan's Webkinz Introduction- Picassa's Web Album

Nope, still a part of the big system of pop culture...no professional immunity here!

Defying Gravitas- Jessie's stream of (sub)consciousness: Logan's Webkinz Introduction- Pictures from Easter Morning --
Just click "The Logan" to continue (seeing more pictures, that is) :o)

What the snobs don’t understand

Talker from Salon.com's "The Fix" section on arts and entertainment:

What reality can teach us: If you can get past the fact that the author of the pro-reality-TV story in the new Atlantic Monthly, Michael Hirschorn, is also an executive vice president at VH1, a channel with its fair share of reality programming, the piece does put forward an interesting thesis. Hirschorn calls reality TV "the liveliest genre on the set right now. It has engaged hot-button cultural issues -- class, sex, race -- that respectable television, including the august 'CBS Evening News,' rarely touches. And it has addressed a visceral need for a different kind of television at a time when the Web has made more traditionally produced video seem as stagey as Moliere." ("The Case for Reality TV," Atlantic Monthly)

The article can be found here (but keep the above information in mind when reading because the article is from The Atlantic Monthly, but was highlighted with the above information on Salon.com):

What the snobs don’t understand

The Case for Reality TV

by Michael Hirschorn

.....

his past January, I had the pleasure of serving as official spear-catcher for a CBS Evening News report on the increasing levels of humiliation on American Idol and other reality-TV shows, including some on my channel, VH1. The segment featured snippets of our shows I Love New York (a dating competition with an urban vibe) and Celebrity Fit Club (which tracks the efforts of overweight singers and actors to get back in shape, and, by extension, reignite their careers). “VH1, among other things, showcases faded celebrities who are fat,” said the CBS correspondent Richard Schlesinger.

Carol Burnett Sues Cartoon/Animated TV Show - Family Guy

I found this on Clipmarks this morning - it was clipped by Eric W - a few students are blogging on Family Guy; therefore, a little litigation-related news is an interesting addition to the discourse on pop culture :o)

clipped from today.reuters.com LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Comedian Carol Burnett has filed a copyright infringement suit against the makers of Fox TV's cartoon sitcom "Family Guy" over an episode poking fun at the performer and her variety show from the 1960s and '70s. The suit, which seeks at least $2 million in damages, also says the cartoon episode used a "slightly altered version" of the copyrighted musical theme to "The Carol Burnett Show" without permission from the 73-year-old entertainer. A spokesman for 20th Century Fox Television, which produces "Family Guy," said on Friday the suit was without merit and that references to Burnett and her show in an 18-second sequence of the cartoon amounted to parody.

StumbleUpon | IndependentMind's web site reviews and blog

StumbleUpon | IndependentMind's web site reviews and blogStumbleUpon | IndependentMind's web site reviews and blog

Corporate Internet Branding History Identity & Logo Design

This site is amazing to see--especially when you give any of the logos some thought -- just look at one-- do you have a particular emotion? non-happy ones count too! Do you have a personal memory or connection that you thought of when you saw one of the logos?

Corporate Internet Branding History Identity & Logo Design

clipped from http://www.historyofbranding.com/